An incomplete criticism?

This “boomer” reader found the letter by Kenneth Lewis in the June 26 issue to be quite confusing and offensive — much more confusing and delusional than the Father Rolheiser column he was critiquing. 

Lewis's lack of specificity as well as his speculations, name calling, and general tone detract from any meaningful points he may have meant to convey. It’s not a letter worthy of being printed in Angelus, whose standards are generally highly admirable.

— Christina Garcia, Claremont