Twenty years after Los Angeles burned in riots stoked by ethnic tensions and animosity between the police and many residents, Angelenos show signs of optimism about race relations and crime in their city, according to a new poll. But the survey, conducted by LMU’s Thomas and Dorothy Leavey Center for the Study of Los Angeles, also revealed pessimism about the city’s future, as well as a small but lingering ethnic divide over how well the diverse population of Los Angeles gets along.
“We see a lot of positive signs in the results of this survey,” said Fernando Guerra, director of the center and professor of political science and Chicana/o studies at LMU. “Angelenos are getting along better with each other, expressing confidence in their police department and feeling safer in their neighborhoods. There are some negative results, but much of that can be attributed to the overall direction of the national economy.”
The Center has conducted surveys about race relations, crime, and the city’s outlook every five years since 1997, the fifth anniversary of the unrest. The most recent snapshot comes from a telephone survey of 1,605 residents conducted from Feb. 1 to March 2. The margin of error is +/- 2.45 percent.
Among the survey’s findings:
---68 percent of respondents said Angelenos of different races and ethnicities get along very well or somewhat well. But there was a difference in perception: 76 percent of white respondents say race relations are good, compared to 65 percent of minorities.
---Respondents gave high marks to the LAPD: seven in 10 say the department is doing “good” or “excellent” work, and more support reappointing Chief Charlie Beck than oppose.
---Though reported criminal activity is down in nearly all categories, 34 percent of respondents said crime has worsened over the last twenty years.
---Los Angeles is headed in the wrong direction, according to 44 percent of respondents — the highest number since 1997. Those surveyed singled out jobs, housing costs, and the local economy as negative issues, and the environment as a bright spot.
Intriguingly, respondents in neighborhoods that were hit by the riots were less likely to predict future rioting than those who live elsewhere in the city — 35 percent versus 44 percent.
“One factor that could explain the response of those in riot areas is their awareness of the continued impact of the riots, in the physical, economic, and social sense,” Guerra said. “The people who lived through the riots and who live in those neighborhoods now have a much keener sense of the costs of such unrest.”
Copies of the survey results are available at the Center’s website, http://www.lmu.edu/csla. or (310) 338-4565.
{gallery width=100 height=100}gallery/2012/0504/riotsside/{/gallery}