Menu

Letters to the Editor

A third party thinking exercise

Marilyn Boussaid • Nov 04, 2024
Thank you for James G. Hanink’s essay on “Building a home for the ‘politically homeless’ ” in the Nov. 1 issue.  It is important for everyone to be aware that there is a third party that represents more fully the teachings of the Catholic Church. Even though American Solidarity Party presidential candidate Peter Sonski is not yet well known, it’s important for voters to clarify in their own minds what to look for in a political platform.  — Marilyn Boussaid, St. James, Redondo Beach

Who abandoned whom?

Fritz Baumgartner, MD • Nov 04, 2024
Did U.S. politics abandon Catholics in 2024? Perhaps we should ask whether Western culture in general, and progressive theologians in particular, abandoned authentic Catholicism in the 1960s. The undeniable revolution permeates our current moral sensibilities six decades later.   — Fritz Baumgartner, MD, Los Angeles

The other side of the abuse settlement

Timothy Harris • Oct 21, 2024
News of the Archdiocese of LA’s sex abuse settlement announced Oct. 16 and reported on AngelusNews.com got a conflicted reaction from me. One on hand, it suggests a measure of accountability for the heinous crimes committed by people who had the highest level of trust from Catholic parents and children. But I cannot help but be disgusted by how our elected officials, like Gov. Newsom and the legislators who passed AB 218, took advantage of the “Me Too” movement to open the statute of limitations … again. By doing so, they gave California plaintiffs’ lawyers the boon of a lifetime to get rich from allegations that were often probably questionable and thinly detailed, and help tear down the Church in the process. I wonder how many of those 1,353 cases would have stood up in an actual trial. I’m all for sackcloth and ashes for the Church’s sins, but the injustices don’t end there. — Timothy Harris, West LA

Underselling this month’s synod

Diane Collison • Oct 07, 2024
After reading Elise Allen’s preview of the October 2024 Synod of Bishops on Synodality “A Flat Finish?,” I have some questions.   When was the last time the Catholic Church dared to raise the issues for open discussion such as: the relationship between the Eastern Catholic Church and the Latin Church; revision of documents for priestly formation and the role of bishops; vocal confession of such sins as those committed against women; forums including a woman theologian and a woman on canon law?   A “flat finish?” Respectfully, it sounds to me like Pope Francis is just warming up. — Diane Collison, Broomfield, CO

Don’t equate PETA with TV villain

Jennifer O’Connor • Sep 23, 2024
Regarding Robert Brennan’s Sept. 17 AngelusNews.com column “Both PETA and Tonia Haddix have it all wrong in ‘Chimp Crazy’ ”: God’s purpose is spelled out in the Bible’s account of the Garden of Eden (Genesis 1) and in the visions of the prophets Isaiah, Amos, Micah, and others. In every instance, God’s ideal is one in which there is no animal exploitation. Tonia Haddix has purposefully caused, and continues to cause, immeasurable animal suffering. Tonka, and the other victims rescued from this proven liar, are thriving in their new sanctuary homes. Rather than garnering support, Haddix exemplifies why primates do not belong in private homes. PETA’s position — that no chimpanzee, monkey, or other wild animal should be kept as a surrogate human child — is the antithesis of the attitude of exotic animal brokers like Haddix. The Church instructs that humanity’s dominion demands “a religious respect for the integrity of creation.” To deny animals their God-given nature by forcing them to serve as pets or props is to ignore their “particular goodness.” This mindset must end. — Jennifer O’Connor, PETA Foundation, Norfolk, Virginia

One candidate less dangerous than the other?

Dorothy Hage • Sep 23, 2024
Having worked in pro-life ministry for many years, I was grateful to see coverage of the IVF debate (“The IVF danger we don’t see”) and the problem with the fate of frozen children in the Sept. 20 issue.  However, I take umbrage with the fact that presidential candidate Donald Trump — who is more reluctant in his stance on IVF — was mentioned twice by name. Meanwhile, Vice President Kamala Harris, who has been way more vehement in her support of IVF, was not named once. She has made “reproductive rights” a major theme of her presidential run and has very liberal views on abortion — at the expense of the “we the people.” — Dorothy Hage, Newbury Park

SUBMIT A LETTER TO THE EDITOR

To submit by mail, send to Letters, Angelus, 3424 Wilshire Blvd. 4th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90010-2241. Include a telephone number and address. To submit online, click below.

WRITE A LETTER

SUBMIT A LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Continue the conversation! We welcome your comments. Anonymous letters, personal attacks, or libellous comments will not be published. Please complete all the required fields in the form below.

  • Contact Information

  • Your Letter

  • Letters must be no more than 300 words. We reserve the right to edit for style, brevity, and clarity.
reset button icon

Start your day with Always Forward!

A daily email newsletter to help you better understand the Church and the world.